Merkel declares Nord Stream 2 pipeline deal with US good for Ukraine

By Geir Moulson July 23, 2021 â€" 5.57am

Berlin: German Chancellor Angela Merkel said on Thursday that a compromise deal that will allow the completion of a Russian gas pipeline to Europe without the imposition of further US sanctions is “good for Ukraine” - a conclusion disputed by Ukraine.

The United States and Germany announced the deal on Wednesday. The two countries committed to countering any Russian attempt to use the Nord Stream 2 pipeline as a political weapon.

A ‘good’ deal: German Chancellor Angela Merkel.Credit:AP

They also agreed to support Ukraine and Poland, both of which are bypassed by the project and fear Russia’s intentions, by funding alternative energy and development projects.

The Nord Stream 2 project has posed a major foreign policy dilemma for the Biden administration. US officials from both parties have long feared it would give Russia too much power over European gas supplies. But the pipeline is almost completed, and the US has been determined to rebuild ties with Germany that were damaged during the Trump administration.

Poland and Ukraine expressed their displeasure over the decision to allow the pipeline’s completion and said efforts to reduce the Russian security threat were not sufficient.

“Differences remain. We saw that in the reactions yesterday,” Merkel told reporters in Berlin, acknowledging there is also opposition in the US Congress.

Tugboats get into position in Baltic Sea for the Russian pipe-laying vessel of the German-Russian Nord Stream 2 gas line.Credit:AP

She noted that Germany now has “a whole lot of work” to do, particularly in trying to secure an extension to a deal on the transit of Russian gas via Ukraine beyond 2024, in supporting the transformation of Ukraine’s energy supply, and in engineering “reverse flow” from European gas supply systems to Ukraine.

Merkel said the deal was “a good step that demanded readiness to compromise from both sides, but on the other hand doesn’t overcome all differences that existed the day before.” She added that “we are not completely defenceless” against Russia, arguing that the possibility of sanctions still exists.

The chancellor dismissed a suggestion that Russia is a more important partner for Germany than Poland and Ukraine. She said that the German-US deal set the right priorities “and so this joint statement, from my point of view, is also good for Ukraine.”

The Ukrainian government, however, strongly deplored the deal.

“We have many questions about how the US-German agreement could reduce security risks for Ukraine and the countries of Central Europe caused by the launch of Nord Stream 2,” Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba said.

Annalena Baerbock, the Green party’s candidate to succeed Merkel in Germany’s September national election, also criticised the deal. In an interview with the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung daily newspaper, Baerbock said the agreement was “not a solution, especially not for security in Ukraine.”

Russia has rejected the claims by the US, Ukraine, Poland and others that it has used energy as a political weapon and insisted it has no intention to do so in the future.

“Russia has never used energy resources as an instrument of political pressure,” Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov told reporters on Thursday. “Russia always has been and will remain a responsible guarantor of the European continent’s energy security.”

A Russian construction worker speaks on a mobile phone in Portovaya Bay, north-west from St. Petersburg, Russia, during a ceremony marking the start of Nord Stream pipeline construction in 2010.Credit:AP

Alexei Miller, the head of state-controlled Russian natural gas giant Gazprom, reaffirmed the company’s readiness to negotiate the continuation of gas supplies via Ukraine after the current deal expires in 2024 “proceeding from economic feasibility and the technical condition of the Ukrainian gas transit system.”

He said Gazprom could even increase the transit volumes through Ukraine but emphasised that future agreements must be based “on market terms.”

Miller argued that Nord Stream 2 is a purely economic project, offering a new supply route that is almost 2000 kilometres shorter than the existing one across Ukraine.

AP

Share this post